“…a survey by the think-tank Policy Exchange, for instance, revealed that 36 per cent of young (British) Muslims believe that those who leave Islam should be killed.”
If the result of the above survey reported in 2007, is to be believed, the height of religious fanaticism and irrational cruelty, worry even someone as apathetic as me.
It should be borne in mind while interpreting it, that Britain is one of the more open-minded and rational societies in the World, as far as rational questioning and tolerance for religious plurality are concerned, probably, much more than the US.
And if someone is inclined to point out the positive aspect of the survey that a significant majority – 64 per cent would not kill ex-Muslims, then, I must confess, for me to summon that much positivity in my outlook is not possible.
Let me try to explain. Cruelty and intolerance – both are not countable attitudes, as in ‘present’ or ‘absent’, but rather, can be best represented as a spectrum. If 36 per cent want religious apostates killed, it also indicates that possibly, the rest prescribe less severe penalities upon leaving Islam. But the fact remains, they might support such penalties.
In essence, the message sent out is – “if you are born a Muslim, you must die a Muslim; no looking ‘here and there’.”
In light of this conclusion, it seems, at least, as far as the subjects of the said survey are concerned, ‘religious’ and ‘tolerance’, are at best oxymorons, and ‘religion’ and ‘peace’ too might get similarly mutually related in the near future.
The reports of the quoted survey and related analyses could be found in the following news pieces:
Lastly, I have noticed that many readers despite reading my posts, do not comment on such ‘sensitive’ issues. For the first time, I request, if you read this, kindly, if not your opinion, at least leave “I read” in the comments’ section. Thanks!